Jenny wrote:the worst part about both of your posts you 2 is .........
it was meant to slander jesus and any and all that admire him and love him and God with all their heart
to make someone want to come and argue with you so you could get a rise out of your BS caca manie you so easily throw around
But you see you forgot this post was turned around to see why you few AREN'T Experiencing Ascension and like big dorks you always walk right inside the traps
i have to go to bed im gigglin to hard my tummy
it's to obvious to all of us
Mr Darwin wrote:Hi Jenny,
You have missed the point entirely. I didn't post the thread in order to slander Jesus, religion or whatever anyone believes. I raised this question as it has become a rather prominent subject of debate in recent times. I recently watched a documentary about this very thing, where the question about the authenticity of Jesus was posed. As with the nature of these programmes they offer arguments on both sides of the debate, there is no right or wrong, the believers will always fall on the side of the legend of Jesus, whereas the non believers will err on the side of it being myth.
Hey Mr Darwin!
I wouldn't worry about Jenny missing the point of your posts about Jesus, she understands very well your true intent. What got her all miffed is she takes this stuff personally because she believes she is the second coming of Christ! Did you believe she was joking when she made these claims? Let's not forget it was you that made me aware of her schizophrenia and it's quite apparent that Jesus is just one of her personas.
You must ask yourself why the Jews have never recognised Jesus as the Messiah, he didn't fulfill the prophecy and therefore was viewed as a false prophet. This is very clear in Judaic religion. As Isomer13 states, the jews know their own religion.
Isomer13 is indeed correct, the Messiah was supposed to be fully human and political, not God incarnate. If the Jesus of the bible truly existed, he was definitely not the political liberator of the Jews.
I have read both of your replies and would ask that you enlighten us further, given that we are Uber ignorant, and also ask you to explain your own understanding of who Jesus is given that "it is obvious to all of us" (quote).What is obvious...? please explain. I think the overall question must be to ask you to tell me and my fellow ignoramouses who the real jesus is, as you are obviously an expert on him and his life and I would happily bow to your superior knowledge. The truth is, all things aside, is that Jesus will be vastly different to you than he is to me, and therefore makes this more a question of religious belief than anything else.
Jenny is no more knowledgeable about Jesus than you are. Everything everyone knows about Jesus is based on the NT, which is biased in favor of a risen Christ. None of it is contemporary or by eyewitnesses. So anyone who claims they have the truth about Jesus is only fooling themselves, including the so-called experts. It is nothing more than mythological conjecture based on the writings of non-contemporaries.
It appears you are reverting back to your old ways, ready to attack without any valid evidence of why you find our comments highly amusing,...
Hmm....it seems to me that you've been forewarned. <g> Not to worry though, when Jenny sees this post of mine it will probably take some of the heat off of you....for a short while. Ha ha ha!!!!
(LMAO) I always thought that the nature of debate was to offer reasons as to why you view our comments as contentious which would encourage further debate.
You're right, this is the nature of debate! But as you're painfully aware, Jenny views any disagreement as an insult or attack. And since you were questioning the legitimacy of one of her personas, it's no wonder she reacted the way she did.
All you have offered is a hollow response with no hard evidence to support your own view. What traps did we walk into, explain...? You obviously find something highly amusing, the floor is yours, I await with bated breath.
Mr Darwin.
Did you expect something more?
fuzoid